As writers, we work alone. We write by ourselves, and often revise by ourselves, plus we may market by ourselves. Left unchecked, we can end up listening to the echo chamber in our heads.
Is that a good idea? When we're talking about writing a manuscript, it's true we need to pay attention to our inner voice to do our creative work, but there is value in tapping into others' thoughts and perceptions of our work. And you can do so through a critique circle. (You can read about the different types of writing groups, including critique circles, here.)
Why does getting other opinions matter? For two reasons. First, because that's how we learn. By seeking people who write and think differently and who have life experiences that differ from ours, we get other points of view on what works in our manuscripts and what doesn't. And that's good, because our potential paying readers are all different, too. Of course, we want to reach those readers! Getting opinions can help us do that.
Second, a critique circle, when it supports diverse voices, demonstrates inclusivity and empowerment. A good circle becomes a platform for all the members to be seen and heard as they share their work, which helps to shape a more vibrant storytelling landscape and everyone can benefit.
So if you're hearing voices-as in, the-writers-in-your-writing-circle voices-it's a good thing. By the way, you don't have to agree with other perspectives, and you never have to accept any suggestions if you don't like them. Your manuscript is your work, after all. Still, by getting other points of view, you can consider a wider range of reader perceptions and you might hear something about how your words land that will affirm your direction, spark a new creative idea, or resonate as something that was nagging you, anyway.
I go into a lot more detail about critique circles, what helps them work well and what hinders them, and how to give and handle feedback in my ebook, The Write Group. I hope you'll check it out!
Comments